South Korea's prime minister honoring the quote-unquote heroes who have died defending the Liancourt Rocks.Not doing much blogging on summer vacation means I miss out on tons of delicious stories. I mean, this blog would write itself with all the sensational Liancourt Rocks garbage in the news. Not surprising if you browse the articles in my "
Liancourt Rocks" category and consider all the over-the-top behavior we'd seen thus far. South Korea has recently
conducted military exercises near the rocks, and has
blamed its diplomats for failing to react to this crisis, a dispute
some papers have said is evidence of the US's favoritism toward Japan. As I said before, half in jest, if you're the US, which East Asian nation would you rather annoy, Japan, or the one that has recently killed a Free Trade Agreement, has held two months of protests on American beef, and has done its best to alienate its strongest military, political, and economic ally? Not saying that the US is trying to piss anyone off, or taking one country's side here in choosing to remain neutral, although for some South Koreans, being "neutral" is the same thing as taking Japan's side, since South Korea believes it has an air-tight case and that this disputed territory is indisputably Korean. A lot of people are upset with the Library of Congress and its decision to
refer to the disputed territory as the Liancourt Rocks, rather than the politically-charged Korean name "Dokdo," or the U.S. Board on Geographic Names' move to change the rocks to "undesignated sovereignty," but I would remind Koreans that what the United States decides to call something in English is an entirely domestic matter and foreigners should not get involved. *cough* I mean, that's what you
tell me, right, about quote-unquote domestic matters like an FTA or like the American military presence? But, seriously, this Liancourt Rocks business is an embarrassing mess.
Lots of other interesting stories out there, too, such as
AOL using North Korean flags next to the names of South Korean golfers, or some
600,000 people flocking to Busan's Haeundae Beach to beat the heat. Another story making headlines is that the number of foreign residents is
up 23% from last year. According to the latest articles there are 891,341 foreigners residing in South Korea, but I'm really not sure why they're using that number or where they're getting this "
2% of the population" figure, unless the latest articles are looking solely at foreign
residents in relation to Korean
adults, because we already saw the number of foreigners eclipse the
one million mark last year. Whether an increase of foreigners is a good or bad thing for any nation is too heady an issue for this little post, but it's worth pointing out that some guy Michael Stevens doesn't seem to happy about it. Three things have lead to an increase in the number of "deadbeat dads," according to
his latest Korea Times letter:
The first being the current economic difficulties, secondly the increasing number of underage adolescents having sex, and lastly an ever increasing foreign community of men coming to this country to live and work.
He continues:
The reasoning behind this article is because recently this problem has occurred to two young Korean women that I know. They both believed that their foreign boyfriends were in love with them and would one day get married, as did their parents and the church they were attending.
Yet, after the young ladies became pregnant the men realized that they didn't want to be tied down. One of them just disappeared one night while the other is still working as a teacher in a ``hagwon" and even though he begged the young lady not to have an abortion is now refusing to give her any form of financial support. It is also clear that after the young man finishes his contract that he, too, will be leaving Korea to go back to his home in America. Once he leaves there will be very little this young Korean woman will be able to do to force him to live up to his obligations.
I don't understand why he's so worked up about deadbeat dads when there are clearly
more important issues to deal with. Also on the foreigner front, the National Police Agency has released "for Foreigners: Guide to Life and Law," available
here as a .pdf file. You might be alarmed to know that, as per page 25 of the guide
Many traffic accidents are caused by foreign workers who do not have a complete understanding of the Korean traffic system or culture.
As most foreigners in Korea know, whenever something unfavorable happens---whether getting pushed on the subway, getting cheated out of money, or getting
killed in a sauna---the excuse is always that the foreigner doesn't understand Korea's culture. It's a line used against foreigners any time they express displeasure at something or hold an opinion contrary to the national line, and it has even been used to
chastise the U.S. Ambassador to South Korea. I don't think this guidebook was being malicious, especially when you see that quotation in context, but it's telling how quickly and naturally the culture line comes out, in all manner of situations, and that in a nation whose drivers rank among the world's worst the police couldn't go a few pages without bringing foreigners into it.